Drugs Policy During Pregnacy

DRUG POLICY DURING PREGNANCYA rightfulness prohibiting il legitimate saturate habit during motherhood has been one focus of the regulation of homophile copy . There be those in support of the state indemnity mainly beca do illegal drug make mathematical function of during pregnancy superpower impermissibly increase the likelihood that a consummate revile result occur and that a fraught(p) woman twain has moral and legal obligations to act in the interests of her child-to-be which the state should wield . To some degree , politics of breach is an accurate impersonation of wherefore people support the honor . Pregnant women who use drugs violate the society s fundamental heathenish beliefs about pregnancy . Rather than placing the necessarily of her child preceding(prenominal) all else , a pregnant woman who use s drugs is viewed as indulgent , placing her desire to stick by a `high in front of the need of her offspring to be born healthy , which is why punishment is deemed appropriate by advocates of the said policy . On the other hand in that location are too those that are against such integrity . The checkup establishment , for antecedent , has been consistently critical of policies that punish women for replacement conduct and demeanour during pregnancyIn the United States , the use of proscribed drugs during pregnancy has been the trigger for both(prenominal) savage pursuit and the court ed removal of the minor immediately after birth . Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are impoverished about the most effective strategy for pursuing criminal convictions against pregnant women . It is undoubtedly true that drugs will sometimes accidental injury a developing foetus , although in practice it is demanding to separate the harmful effects of antepartum drug use fr om the parallel disturb of poor forage , i! nadequate prenatal care , sexually transmitted sickness and a helter-skelter lifestyle .

It is also true that a woman s license to take illegal drugs during pregnancy is non a fundamental self-direction deserving rigorous legal comfortion Nevertheless , using the law to protect fetuses against the women carrying them has , for some(prenominal) reasons , proved to be both illogical and comeback productiveFirst , it is in general supposed that the state s interest in protecting fetal health becomes weightier the closer the fetus is to barrier , yet ironically the pregnant woman s behavior is least likely to take in a negative impact upon fetal health during the make it weeks of pregnancy (Jackson , 2001 . If criminal sanctions are only able to protect the fetus when it least needs protection , they are patently a manifestly fruitless tool . Second , attaching indebtedness to pregnant women users serves as a powerful deterrent to prenatal attendance . Third , the storage area of pregnant women is extremely improbable to benefit the developing fetus . It is , for example , notoriously lightsome to obtain drugs in prisons . heretofore if women are success encompassingy remote from drug suppliers sudden climb-down can cause oral abortionFinally , it is clear that reducing want levels and improving access to prenatal care would promote babe health much more than effectively and cheaply than the prosecution and incarceration of pregnant drug addicts Thus , it is clear that the tip purpose of penalizing pregnant illegal...If you need to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.c! om

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper