The Law with Teens and Nude Photos

Composition 101 October 18, 2012 In Dahlia Lithwicks article Teens, Nude Photos and the Law, she talks about how teenaged boys and girls atomic number 18 sending nude statue pictures to their boyfriends or girlfriends. They use their mobile devices like mobile phone phones, ipod, com typeseters and their cameras to send their nude image. She then addresses the consequences of the nude photo that the teenager has received. The teenager that received the photo terminate be charged with a felony of babe pornography. The author then discusses why the teenager should not be toughened harshly.She states that many an(prenominal) of the teenagers atomic number 18 unbosom immature and they dont hit the hay the consequences of sending nude photos to each other. In her article she argues that the criminal jurist system is taking it too far in charging the teenagers as infant pornographers. I agree with the author because there is a real conundrum with criminalizing sexting as a for m of child pornography. The teenagers caught with the photo will be charged with child pornography. Child pornography is a serious law-breaking and can preserve for forever on your lifetime record and bodge up your life.The majorities of the teenagers that are charged with the crime are not take down predators, nevertheless a picture like has big consequences if its ever to get out on the internet. In my first argument, Dahlia Lithwick states that the teenagers are being punished to harshly. (Lithwick 492) She is ripe the charges against them are too staring(a). They can stay on their record for a long time or change sur memorial tablet forever. If the teenager would go look for a job and they were to pull up his records and they find that he has a child pornography offence, they wont want to hire him.Who would want to hire a person who takes images of kids? It is a serious offence too bulk all everywhere the world, but its a big charge just for a teen. Especially if that teen is a boy and receives a random photo on his booth phone and its a nude photo of his girlfriend and she is drunk. Its not his fault that she is drunk. She is a drunk and underage girl. Teens dont know any infract. some(prenominal), well most of the teenagers are all bland immature. Many think that being 18,17,16,15 they think they are grown when they truly are not.Most all the teenagers dont know fully whats right from molest. There mind is not fully developed and when something goes wrong the kids that think that there grown, go straight to their parents for help. Thats why they experience grown parents to help them in life. Thats why all the decide that prosecuted the teens as child pornographers cant forget that they were too in one case teenagers. The people that make up the criminal justice system cant forget that they once too did stupid things when they were little.At least once they of had to receive on photo of their girlfriend or boyfriend nude. Many of the t imes the kids do it for fun. They think its being sexy. The kids these age are not the same as the kids from a long time ago. We have so much technology now, that it help us communicate better with people and not be able to do those things. Dahlia, in her article states We look to forget that kids can be as tech-savvy as Bill supply but as gullible as Bambi. (Lithwick 493). She is right, teenagers now a days are tech smart. They know how to handle a phone better than our parents.What teenagers dont realize when taking bad images is that there displace themselves in a bad situations. There can be digital dating violence. They can use those images and put them on profiles like face disk. Recently there was a page on face book of girls that are nude. The girls that were put out there were very upset and they precious the come out shut down. They were mad at the creator who made the site but it not his fault its the girls who took the images and gave it out. The site was out for a while and a lot of people got to see it.Right after charming much the whole world saw it they finally took it down. Now the girls that were seen on the image are now marked for life or for a long time. People that know her will remember that she was in a bad photo. Thats when the teens realize that they did wrong but many still dont learns there lesson. They are still going to be doing it because of relationship pressure. Most girls are the ones that are getting taken profit off. The criminal justice system should change the way they label children as child pornographers.They are just making things worse. They need to find a way a better way to help solve the problem. Labeling children with these label are not going to help it stop. They need to show test copy that its actually killing and hurting people emotionally. There have been many accounts of teens being depressed because of a bad photo. The system needs to outdoor stage up and help out the ones who are victims of thes e situations. They need to label the right people with these labels because teens are not dangerous. The older people can be charged as hild pornographers because they are grown and they know of what they are doing. Those are the only ones they should be charged. Over all, Dahlia Lithwick has a point, teens all over are being charged with child pornography for sending and receiving nude photos of their girlfriends. The police said that by sending nude photos girls can put them selves at risk and that has serious consequences so they put a severe consequence on them. They shouldnt label them at a puppyish age just for a nude photo, there teens, they can be immature.