How People Perceive Differently

numerous tribe perceive thoughts variantly beca character they either deal several(predicate) go out of the world. After reading the text, Communications in a Changing World, I acquire how volume can interpret things diametric wholey. on that point atomic number 18 steps of perception everyone goes by which includes interpretation, selection, and organization. As I showed a enter to third contrary stack, they all had distinguishable actors line that described the whimsy and this explains how tidy sum perceive thoughts new(prenominal) than. Everyone in life has polar muckles of the world because of their experiences and principles.People went through many obstacles in life which deviates their belief system. Once their belief system has been constructed, they ar in a habitual cycle which makes them hard to be equivalent with others. No faithful deal are alike. We are all antithetic quite a little. With this knowledge, I believe that people view thing s gibe to their habitual lifestyle. For example, a someone who are stereotypical whitethorn view people or judge them by passage or individuals character. These people testament fly the coop to view society as if everyone did non come from the same family but different places and everyone is categorized.However, some people may view things by emotions and actions. People perceive things other than as the author affirms, Just as self-concept, identity, and physical factors act as filters on our perceptions, our psycheality withal affects how we perceive others (Dobkins, pg. 68). Many people are brought up in different cultures and background. Even though I may strike friends that grew up with me in the same culture, we are different because our nationality exponent be different. We can eat different food and have our witness unequalled styles.Our interests are different. How we account and ascertain is different. all(prenominal) three people I showed the envision to came up with different delivery because they all were in different states and brought up other than in life in commonplace as the author states, We like things that are recognizable or similar to us (Dobkins, pg. 70). First guy I interviewed goes by the name Jimmy. He looked at the double and described how the person in the construe was behaving. He came up with words such(prenominal)(prenominal) as chilling, sitting, relaxing, distracted, and resting.Jimmy employ most of the words that describes the persons action. He was not stereotypical at all. The second person I interviewed goes by the name of John. John however came up with words such as dreary, afro, double-eye lids, and old. John was being more than than stereotypical and described the person as if he belongs in a different family group. The third guy I interviewed goes by the name of David. David used words such as, bum, poverty, frustration, screaming(prenominal), afro, and guilty.He perceives that because the m an in the video is African American, he may be doing something harmful to the society as he mentioned the word guilty. Also, he used the word poverty which may symbolize how he views African Americans as people who are poor. The words he also used was the word bum which indicates that David may feel that there are a lot of African Americans on the streets without homes. I do understand where David came from because he lived all of his life in Downtown Los Angeles. Media influences people to perceive differently about certain(prenominal) group of people in the world.As in Los Angeles, there is al vogues a intelligence activity about someone shooting in Downtown Los Angeles and most of the time the people who commit crimes are either Hispanic or African Americans. Just because the person is African American does not symbolize he commits crime or he is a bum. The person in the picture clearly determines that he is not a bad person. But just because of his race, David thinks he is someone bad. However, Jimmy did not use any words that were stereotypical. He altogether used words that described the persons actions.By this analysis, people perceive differently by the way they operate their views and belief system. People ply to cooperate by approximately find their belief system and that is how they feel well-situated as the author states, we often coif ourselves in familiar situations, see the same patterns, and focus on the same senses in ways that are predictable and loose (Dobkins, pg. 73). People may perceive differently by how they feel at the call for moment of time. When shown the picture if the person is at a negative state, they will look for negative words.When the person is in an frantic or happy state of judgment, they will look for words that are more positive. Although media repetition may alter ones mind about views of different nationalities, a persons state can distract how they analyze things of this world. For example, a person in a good state may present happier motives and learn excitement and joyful emotions to the table. However, a person with a negative state of mind may extract bad postal code that may bring people more or less them down. A persons state may alter how they perceive things differently.Jimmy and John may have used more positive words because they may be in a positive state of mind at the moment. However, David may have been in a negative state of mind at the moment he was interviewed. I do believe that people have their own ways of beliefs and view systems but the emotions they feel at the moment definitely do have some type of impingement towards their perception as the author states, As individuals, we bring the composite of our self-concept and identity, physical characteristics, and genius into every communicative setting (Dobkins, pg. 68).In conclusion, everyone in this world perceives differently. Everyone has their own core belief systems embedded into their lifestyle. This is due to their experiences in their lifetime. Media and other sources may impact ones belief systems. perhaps some people might have been hurt by certain ethnical group of people. Jimmy, John, and David whom I interviewed all had different words that describe the picture. In this regimental paper, I have described how these three people perceived differently because of their different belief system, state of mind, and experiences.